Unusual Courses
Here are some mini-course descriptions taken from HCSSiM maxi-mini catalogs in recent years.
| Contract This: Fractals! (Taught by Lawrence Valby and Cynthia Vinzant)
GLAUCON: (seeing a tree branch) Look! A fractal. The branch splits into smaller branches, each of which looks like the larger branch. SOCRATES: So, would you say that a fractal is anything that is self-similar? G: Well, yes. S: Do you consider the real line a fractal? G: Why no! S: Is the real line self-similar? G: Well, I guess so. If you zoom in, it looks the same. S: Clearly, you need a better definition of fractals. Would you say that a fractal is a fixed point of a contraction mapping in some Hausdorff metric space, whose box dimension is fractional? G: Hmm… yes, that sounds better. S: Are you sure? The Principle of Solid Reality: (Taught by Ari Turner)
Dear Mathematics Students, I have a theory which I have been showing to numerous people from much esteemed Universities, but such people cannot get beyond the rigid constraint of universally accepted but not true theories. I hope that you will be able to see my theories with a fresh mind. I have a principle, of Solid Reality, which says that a solid object is solid. Scientists are very often described as rational and reasonable people, but I would like to prove this wrong: Scientists believe that a solid gold sphere may be cut up into five pieces and reassembled into two solid gold spheres (the Banach Tarski Paradox). My principle of Solid Reality proves them insane. Scientists believe that atoms and molecules may pass through solid walls and my Principle proves them to be bonkers. They believe that squeezing a solid object can cause it to liquefy and my Principle proves them to be fantastically unhinged. Scientists believe that yellow pigs evolved into human beings, and even the idea of a Yellow Pig is an abomination. Science and math are not the study of common sense—so they are certainly wrong! I shall present many strange scientific dogmas (from topology, measure theory, quantum mechanics, and?…) so that you will see how humorously scientists have misled themselves. Sincerely, Ari Turner Manager of Bank of Narrowton Linear Algebra Methods in Combinatorics: (Taught by Jonah Blasiak)
In this mini we will begin by reading How to Stop Worrying and Start Multiplying Large Matrices by Hand. After that we will watch The Matrix a bunch of times. If this sounds scary to you, you are in luck, because we will also learn that linear algebra is much more than multiplying matrices, and has cool connections with geometry (including 4-line conics), probability, algebra, and combinatorics. It is not difficult to learn and prove many basic linear algebra theorems, but it is difficult to grasp the importance and wide applicability of its methods. Linear algebra solves many problems effortlessly where other methods make no headway. We will discuss basic linear algebra and survey some of its applications in combinatorics. We will constrain regular graphs of girth 5, bound the number of points in Euclidean space with only 2 separating distances, learn several cool ways of computing determinants, and more! |